Wild 76ers decision takes a depressing turn as ex-guard suffers brutal fate

The Philadelphia 76ers' decision to re-sign Kyle Lowry to a one-year deal is described as puzzling and disappointing to fans and analysts. Despite signs pointing to this move, the rationale for choosing Lowry over other available backcourt options, like De'Anthony Melton who was seen as having more to offer, remains unclear. The article questions the logic of relying on Lowry, a six-time All-Star whose recent performance was considered poor enough to warrant retirement, as the emergency playmaker off the bench.

This decision had a direct negative consequence for Jared Butler. The 76ers declined Butler's team option specifically to create roster space for Lowry (and Eric Gordon). As a result, Butler, who would have been entering his fifth NBA season, is currently without a team. He is not even playing on a Summer League roster, and with most teams finalizing their rosters for the upcoming season, his chances of finding a new NBA team are seen as increasingly difficult.

The article highlights that Butler showed promise during his brief time with the 76ers last season after arriving from Washington. Averaging 11.5 points and 4.9 assists in 24.4 minutes per game, with shooting percentages of nearly 43% from the field and 35.2% from three-point range, he presented a solid option as a third-string point guard. However, the front office prioritized veteran presence and locker room influence over Butler's on-court contributions.

From a purely basketball perspective, the choice of Lowry over Butler is deemed illogical. While acknowledging Butler's inconsistency, the article argues he currently offers a more robust skill set than Lowry at this stage of their careers. The 76ers' choice is portrayed as potentially devastating for Butler, with his current unrostered status and the approaching 2025-26 season potentially signaling the end of his NBA career.